PCC Public Advisory

 

System Maintenance Advisory: MAO E-Notification System

Please be advised that the MAO E-Notification System will undergo scheduled maintenance to implement system enhancements from 01 April to 06 April 2026. During this period, the system will be temporarily unavailable.

The last day for electronic submissions through the MAO E-Notification System will be on 31 March 2026 (5:00 PM).

If there are submissions due during the scheduled maintenance period, all concerned parties are advised to ensure the early submission of the necessary documents prior to the maintenance dates.

The enhanced MAO E-Notification System will resume normal operations on Tuesday, 07 April 2026.

For any questions or concerns, please contact the Mergers and Acquisitions Office via email at mergers@phcc.gov.ph or by telephone at +632 8771 9722 local 252.

Please be guided accordingly.

 

 

 

Advisory: LMS Rebranding to PCC eCLASS

In line with its rebranding efforts, PCC's Learning Management System (LMS), previously known as iCLP: Online Learning Hub on Competition Law and Policy, will now be called PCC eCLASS: Enhanced Competition Learning Activities Spaces.

Correspondingly, the platform’s domain name will be changed from iclp.phcc.gov.ph to eclass.phcc.gov.ph.

Please be advised that the LMS will be temporarily unavailable from March 27, 2026 (5:00 PM) to March 31, 2026 (11:59 PM) to facilitate this transition.

Beginning April 1, 2026, users may access PCC’s online courses through the new domain.

 

 

 

PCC Advisory: Trunkline Service Interruption

 

/ PCC asks SC to lift CA injunction blocking review of P69.1-B telco deal

PCC asks SC to lift CA injunction blocking review of P69.1-B telco deal

PRESS RELEASE 2017-012
April 19, 2017

PCC asks SC to lift CA injunction blocking review of P69.1-B telco dealApril 19, 2017

The Philippine Competition Commission (PCC) filed a petition before the Supreme Court on Tuesday to annul the writ of preliminary injunction issued by the Court of Appeals 12th Division restraining PCC’s review of Philippine Long Distance Telephone Co. and Globe Telecom, Inc.’s P69.1-billion joint acquisition of San Miguel Corporation’s telco assets in May last year. 
 
The CA issued the injunction order in August 2016 and denied PCC’s motion for reconsideration in February 2017.
 
PCC lamented the CA’s disregard of the public interest involved in the review of the competition concerns arising from the telco deal.
 
In its petition, PCC said “[a]ny court, acting by its best lights, would have easily determined from the outset that the public interest promoted by PCC’s review of the Acquisition should never be subordinated to any supposed urgency and necessity to grant injunctive relief against speculative business losses and transient commercial inconveniences.”  Yet, the petition said, “[the CA], against all logic, cast its lot with the Goliaths of the telecommunications sector.”
 
“How [the CA] ended up according paramount importance to protecting dominant industry players from these alleged losses and inconveniences over the State’s duty of ensuring the consumer welfare of millions of Filipinos remains a mystery,” the petition added.
 
PLDT and Globe have adamantly resisted scrutiny of the telco deal and refused to disclose the terms of the co-use of the 700 MHz subject of the transaction.
 
On the other hand, there has been widespread clamor from various stakeholders for the agency to exercise its mandate to review the transaction. Consumer interest groups and business organizations such as the Joint Foreign Chambers Association of the Philippines and the Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry have expressed their concerns over the potentially pernicious effects of the deal. 
 
The petition exemplifies PCC’s firm commitment to foster fair competition and advance consumer welfare.
 
“This petition also sends a message to consumers and businesses. The country’s first-ever competition authority will not back down or be intimidated by companies who have grown accustomed to unregulated business practices that hamper competition and ultimately hurt the consumers,” said PCC Chairman Arsenio M. Balisacan.
 
“We hope that the Supreme Court will grant our petition and finally allow us to fulfill our mandate to review the deal in the interest of promoting competition in the telco market,” he added.

Share this Post:
Back